- The target has a record of success.
- The mobbers make up the rules as they go along and do not follow the accepted university due process procedures.
- The timing usually favors the mobbers, such as choosing to attack after the faculty member has had a serious medical procedure.
- The mobbers protest vehemently against any external review of their actions.
- The mobbers attempt to carry out their attacks in complete secrecy, using such tactics as anonymous hate mail left in the target’s mailbox.
- The charges against the target are for relatively minor instances, such as alleging that a faculty member has said certain things that the mobbers find objectionable.
- There is a unanimity of negative opinion about the target.
- The target is selected first and then the charges are brought.
- The mobbers use “impassioned rhetoric” in attacking the target.
- The mobbers spread rumors and gossip about the target.
From: Women In Higher Education
No comments:
Post a Comment