Imperial College London is to examine its staff policies after the
death of an academic who was believed to have been placed under a
performance review.
Stefan Grimm, professor of toxicology in the
Faculty of Medicine at Imperial, was found dead in Northwood, Middlesex,
in September. An inquest was opened and adjourned at the West London
District Coroner’s Court on 8 October.
Speaking to Times Higher Education
on condition of anonymity, two academics who knew Professor Grimm, who
was 51, said that he had complained of being placed under undue pressure
by the university in the months leading up to his death, and that he
had been placed on performance review.
He is understood to have
been unsuccessful in a number of grant applications, and to have been
told that if he continued to struggle in this regard his job would be at
risk.
The academics said Professor Grimm had felt let down by
Imperial and did not feel he was given sufficient support in the months
leading up to his death.
THE understands that shortly
before he died, Professor Grimm asked not be named as the corresponding
author on one of his recently published papers, and one of his
colleagues took on the role instead.
A spokeswoman for Imperial
said that the college would provide “all the assistance it can” as the
statutory authorities conduct their investigation, and that the
university was to conduct its own review.
“Following Professor
Grimm’s death, Imperial’s provost has tasked the director of human
resources and one of the college’s senior elected academic
representatives to review the relevant college policies and procedures,”
she said.
“Their report will be considered by a senior group led
by the provost, and the college will move swiftly to implement any
recommendations.”
Her statement also says: “Imperial College
London seeks to give every member of its community the opportunity to
excel and to create a supportive environment in which their careers may
flourish.
“As with all serious and tragic events involving the
loss of life of serving staff or current students, the college conducts
appropriate reviews of the circumstances in order to see whether wider
lessons may be drawn.
“At a time when family, friends, colleagues
and students are still coming to terms with a death, it is important to
undertake any reviews in a manner that respects these sensitivities, and
that does not create a more difficult or challenging environment for
those people.”
In response to claims that the university had not
circulated information to colleagues of Professor Grimm, other than a
short announcement of his death, the spokeswoman said she was “aware
that a number of Stefan’s former colleagues and students have written an
obituary and have submitted it to one of Nature’s publications”. She
said that Imperial was “planning to republish this, with permission,
when it appears”.
Details of Professor Grimm’s funeral, she added, were “a matter for the family”.
From: http://www.timeshighereducation.co.uk/news/imperial-college-london-to-review-procedures-after-death-of-academic/2017188.article
3 comments:
I'll bet that the institution will be let off the hook and nothing will be done.
I remember when Dr. Valery Fabrikant went on his shooting spree at Concordia University in the early 1990s. I recall that there was an inquest into the circumstances leading to the incident. Fabrikant, of course, was tried, found guilty and started doing time in the crowbar hotel. As far as I understand, he's still there.
However, the inquest determined that there was indeed a problem at the university but, as I recall, that's where it stayed. The institution got a slap on the fingers and was told that people there had behaved like naughty children.
Meanwhile, the result is that several people had died, several more had their lives disrupted, and nothing appears to have been fixed.
The same will be true at Imperial. Other departments have revealed that a significant proportion of the academics have been bullied by their heads. This is know to HR and senior management but they don't do anything about it. I think they should be prosecuted under health and safety legislation for putting the mental health of their employees at risk. The unions should be organising this on behalf of the staff who are naturally frightened of speaking out. I think some heads of department (I could name them but won't) should be asked to change or leave. That would send a definite message that this unacceptable and give more staff confidence.
Meanwhile if you thought of becoming an academic at Imperial, don't! Let this be a warning of how you will be treated.
THE FAMILIES OF VICTIMS, AND SURVIVERS, SHOULD CONSIDER TO PURSUE CORPORATE MANSLAUGHTER IN THESE CASES.
THE PERPS SHOULD BE PURSUED INSTITUTIONALLY AND INDIVIDUALLY
Post a Comment