September 24, 2016

Bullying and Discrimination at University of Leicester (UoL): Justice for maxcasu

My name is Max Casu; I was a mature Ph.D. student at the UoL.
 
Unfortunately all my excitements about the above Ph.D. turned into a nightmare;
 
·  It was since the beginning of my academic course that I was continuously insulted, humiliated and treated at lower standards respect other students from senior academic members at the UoL.
·  During my Ph.D. I was able to generate 4 manuscripts and consequently 4 potential publications. Only 1 manuscript was published, with an extremely and unjustified severe delay (the manuscript was ready to be published in the 2010 but it was published only 3 years later). The UoL failed to substantiate what caused the failures of my publications.
 
·  I was accused by Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) that I was constantly missing my academic meetings. Actually, many pieces of evidence prove completely the opposite, it was Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) persistently postponing the meetings or inviting me to take part in meetings decided at the very last minute. Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) was actually postponing group meetings because other students were not able to attend, and they were always being justified by their absence.
 
·  I was obstructed and not supported, applying for post-doc positions or any further higher education academic courses. Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) provided me in a deliberately way a “bland letter of reference“, he was incited acting in this way by Prof Julian Ketley (Head of genetics dep.). It caused me being rejected for an important Legal post-graduate academic course at London South Bank University (LSBU).
 
·  Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) failed to provide me with the adequate support during the writing of my Thesis and the preparation of my Viva Voce. Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) admitted his failures. As a result, I struggled with large distress during the writing of my Thesis and the preparation of my Viva Voce, it caused me the inevitable loss of enjoyment and it inexorably undermined my health causing me a series of severe faintness that affected my Ph.D. and the temporary suspension of it.
 
·  The UoL removed Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) and replaced him with 2 new supervisors, but this remedy was unfortunately applied at very late stages when my Thesis was already submitted and my Viva Voce was already performed.
 
·  During my Ph.D., the UoL provided faulty equipment. A homemade software called “BeFly!” lacking of registration licence and consequently in breach of the UoLs policies. The homemade software BeFly! was never be subjected for its accuracy and reliability. It caused me the removing of a large amount of data already analysed, generating me severe stress and frustration. Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) and Prof Julian Ketley (Head of genetics dep.) suggested me to remove the data already analysed. Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) and Dr Ezio Rosato (Internal Examiner) later admitted that the software BeFly! was mistaken.
 
·  I was accused by Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) that; I blamed other students of disrupting my work and my experiments. On many occasions, I invited the UoL and particularly Dr Flaviano Giorgini (Former Supervisor) to substantiate these accusations. The UoL, unfortunately, failed to do so. These accusations were forwarded to me only during the procedures of my internal complaint, a clear action of victimisation.
 
·  There is a lot of severe failures during the complaint procedures. The UoL did not respect the internal protocol of the complaint and the appealing procedures, being responsible for irregular procedures; it again generated me a lot of distress. The UoL denied the possibility of a prima facie case.
 
·  The UoL failed to provide my personal files (data subject request access) on the standard time in respect of the Data Protection Act 1998. I received my files after 4 months respect the approved time-scale.
 
·  The UoL prior to my Viva Voce decided to appoint a chair without to inform me and without to substantiate why this decision was taken.
 
·  After having successfully performed the Viva Voce, I was notified that I passed my Viva Voce but also I was notified that I failed my Thesis. The UoL failed to substantiate which potential failures caused the failure of my Thesis. The UoL provided an academic report being very vague and elusive and did not inform me about the potential errors involved on my Thesis. The UoL sustained during my appealing procedure that; “it was not fundamental to know the exact errors involved in my Thesis”. Most of the specific errors listed in the academic report could not be found in my Thesis. The academic report deferred completely from the corrections provided by Dr Kevin Moffat (External ExaminerUniversity of Warwick) that actually showed a list of minor corrections that were amended in less than two weeks. The UoL failed to inform me about my rights of appeal. There is a large amount of internal e-mails from Prof Julian Ketley (Head of genetics dep.) and other senior members of the UoL, which showed how the UoL premeditated the failure of my Ph.D.
 
·  Despite having performed well during my academic course, and even done better respect many others Ph.D. students, despite having generated 4 potential publications and having successfully passed my exams, the UoL rejected my Ph.D. The UoL failed to justify why I failed my Thesis.

·  Accordingly, the UoL appointed a chair in order to prevent me appealing against their decision. The above shows a clear evidence of conspiracy, bias, and prejudice against me.
 
·  The UoL convening appointing 2 new supervisors but it was done after the completion of the writing of my Thesis, the submission of it and the preparation of my Viva Voce.
 
·  According to the UoL‘s policies, I should have had 2 supervisors since the beginning of my Ph.D.
 
·  There are a lot of severe failures during the academic appealing procedures.
 
·  The UoL was constantly breaching their own policies, the QAA code of conduct and the related Law. The UoL was repeatedly invited to investigate the above and put a remedy as it was actually expected.
 
·  The UoL neglected completely the severity of the events occurred, increasing my stress and frustration that ultimately affected my health severely with a series of severe faintness.
 
·  My complaint was forwarded to the OIA.
 
·  The OIA did not consider my complaint appropriately, and despite having provided tangible evidence of the episodes occurred my complaint was classified being “NOT JUSTIFIED“. Consequently, the OIA failed taking action against the UoL. The OIA actually awkwardly attempted to justify and legitimate the awful and malicious behaviour of the UoL and its senior members.
 
·  The case was referred to the Administrative Court for a judicial review against the OIA. The Administrative Court close my case without providing me the possibility having a fair hearing, stating that my case was “TOTALLY WITHOUT MERIT” and without to have the possibility to challenge this decision.
 
For more detailed please visit the following web site clicking to the following link; my case.
  

7 comments:

Anonymous said...

As usual UCU are useless in helping with these most deserving of cases!

Max Casu said...

Hi when there is to take position by those potential bodies that are hypothetically involved defending the students or the person victim of such abuse for which they should enforce the law and regulations they actually disappear see above about the OIA and the Administrative Court

Anonymous said...

I am really sorry to read of your case Max- un-fortunately officials on both sides go into "procedure mode" and justice then goes out the window. "What is Justice?" asks Ellen Brokovitch, to which her pro bono attorney replies "its a $10 million lawyer". You have 2 routes which are not mutually exclusive (1) lawyer up, if you can afford it- or try to get one of the few companies that might do this kind of case "no win, no fee" and, or (2) form yourself a victim's association and embarrass the hell out of them....When I say, not mutually exclusive, if you go down the legal route be aware of sub-judice clauses, but even with them there's nothing to stop the local paper covering your story only don't appear to give them an interview about a court case! Judges don't like that! GOOD LUCK MAX....

Anonymous said...

If there is something similar to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) in US< get all the grant proposals written by your professor, all info about money spent on various projects. I am pretty sure he would have spent some money for non-research non-academic purposes, like buying stuff for home with government money, arranging unnecessary travels, buying unnecessary equipment even when old equipment is in lab, etc.. look for the sh*t he has eaten before and show it to the world.

Anonymous said...

Also, go to department of education in UK, attorney general - state and federal and complain. If you can find proof of financial mismanagement by this a**hole, you WIN!! Directly report fraud to the federal funding agencies, go directly to the Inspector General and file a confidential report. Do not expect to get the degree. It is gone, get a job, make money and fight the ba**ards. Expose them. Check is he has extra-marital affairs, expose it, look for drug or alcohol abuse by this a**hole, expose him legally. You can do a lot of things. Make it your life's mission. I am in the same boat. Once I make enough money I will set up a fund to fight legal battles.

Max Casu said...

Hello thanks for your comments, I am doing already all my best to expose this story to the media and it will be done exactly next week when I will launch my petition. I do not expect anything despite I have earned my PhD, I am proud because despite all this hassles I was capable to go ahead suffering in silence and going through all the bureaucratic procedures in order to have my rights recognized. Here in UK it is a problem of system rather than a specific problems from the Universities, as you can see the Office of the Indipendent ajudicator (OIA) first and the Administrative Court after have discharged the case despite the tangible evidence provided.

Max Casu said...

Please sign my petition

https://www.change.org/p/gordon-marsden-mp-shadow-minister-for-further-education-skills-academic-bullying-at-the-university-of-leicester-please-sign-my-petition-to-get-justice?recruiter=639842141&utm_source=share_for_starters&utm_medium=copyLink